Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Putusan MK Nomor 313/PHPU-BUP.XXIII/2025 dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Bupati Rahmat Sabrianto; Ahmad Rustan; Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11892

Abstract

Disputes over the results of the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) are a consequence of the dynamics of democracy in Indonesia, which demands a fair and constitutional resolution mechanism. One prominent case is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 313/PHPU-BUP.XXIII/2025 concerning the 2024 Regent and Deputy Regent Election of North Barito Regency, which involved alleged vote buying practices in the revote (PSU). This study aims to analyze the Constitutional Court's legal considerations in deciding the case, particularly regarding violations of vote buying, consistency with democratic principles, and its implications for legal certainty. The method used is normative legal research with an approach of legislation, doctrine, and analysis of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court prioritizes a substantive approach by assessing not only the vote count results but also the integrity of the election process. The practice of money politics that is proven to be structured, systematic, and massive (TSM) is considered to undermine democratic principles, so the Constitutional Court imposed sanctions on the candidate pairs and ordered a revote. This ruling affirms the Constitutional Court's role as the guardian of the constitution and democracy and strengthens legal certainty, although it still raises debate regarding the proportionality of sanctions and the protection of political rights.  
Problematika Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bawah Undang-Undang: Studi Analisis Putusan Nomor 57/P/HUM/2019 Moh Farid Insan Sahiddin; Rudy Iskandar Ichlas; Fahmi Jambak
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11745

Abstract

The implementation of Supreme Court decisions in reviewing regulations below statutes constitutes a crucial mechanism to uphold the rule of law and maintain normative hierarchy. However, in practice, the enforcement of material judicial review decisions frequently encounters structural and normative obstacles. This study aims to analyze the problems surrounding the implementation of Supreme Court Decision Number 57/P/HUM/2019 and its implications for legal certainty and the effectiveness of judicial review in Indonesia. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings reveal that weak execution mechanisms, absence of sanctions for non-compliance, and the dualism of judicial review authority between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court contribute to the ineffectiveness of such decisions. Strengthening the binding force of Supreme Court rulings requires harmonization of the judicial review system and the establishment of supervisory enforcement mechanisms.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rustan Fahmi Jambak Moh Farid Insan Sahiddin Rahmat Sabrianto