Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice
Sisca Utami Damajanti
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Ketentuan Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Damayanti, Sisca
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4769

Abstract

Entitas hukum yang sering dipilih oleh pengusaha ialah Perseroan Terbatas (PT), karena menawarkan berbagai peluang dalam berbisnis. Seiring dengan diresmikannya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, aturan terkait PT mengalami perubahan yang signifikan. Kini, PT tidak hanya terbatas pada bentuk persekutuan modal dan saham, tetapi juga dapat didirikan oleh seorang individu yang mencapai syarat Usaha Mikro dan Kecil (UMK). Dengan memanfaatkan pendekatan hukum normatif, pendekatan legislatif, analisis, dan pemahaman konseptual, yang didukung oleh teknik studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini menganalisis ketentuan serta syarat pendirian PT dalam konteks UU Cipta Kerja. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja mengenal dua jenis PT, yaitu: (1) PT yang berbentuk persekutuan saham atau modal, dan (2) PT perorangan yang mencapai syarat UMK, yang dapat didirikan oleh seorang individu melalui surat pernyataan pendirian tanpa memerlukan akta notaris.
Reformulating Indonesian Bankruptcy Law: Substantive Justice and Good Faith Sisca Utami Damajanti
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 5 Issue 1 (2026)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v5i1.959

Abstract

Indonesian bankruptcy law, governed by Law Number 37 of 2004, was designed to balance creditor rights with debtor rehabilitation while ensuring orderly insolvency resolution. However, two decades of implementation reveal systemic dysfunction whereby formalistic judicial interpretation has transformed the law into an instrument of strategic litigation rather than equitable dispute resolution. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, case study, and comparative approaches to deconstruct the prevailing application and propose comprehensive reformulation. The study identifies pervasive judicial formalism as the fundamental pathology, wherein courts mechanically apply technical default criteria without substantive inquiry into genuine insolvency or business viability. This enables widespread abuse through strategic bankruptcy filings by competitors and creditors pursuing collateral objectives, resulting in premature liquidation of viable enterprises and substantial economic waste. The research establishes that effective reform requires anchoring the system in two interdependent principles: substantive justice, mandating holistic assessment of debtor financial condition and restructuring prospects beyond procedural compliance, and good faith, functioning as rigorous procedural gatekeeper to filter abusive petitions. Implementation necessitates legislative amendments refining insolvency definitions, explicitly requiring good faith examination, and strengthening rehabilitation mechanisms. Judicial capacity enhancement through specialized training in financial analysis and institutional innovations including dedicated insolvency divisions prove essential. This reformulation framework transforms Indonesian bankruptcy law from strategic weapon into credible instrument serving economic efficiency, commercial justice, and constitutional values, thereby supporting Indonesia's developmental trajectory and investment climate enhancement.
Digital Transformation of Land Administration: Strengthening Good Land Governance and Legal Certainty in Indonesia Sisca Utami Damajanti
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice [IN PRESS] Vol. 5 Issue 3 (2026)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v5i3.1047

Abstract

Land administration in Indonesia continues to face persistent problems, including overlapping ownership claims, land disputes, document forgery, and inconsistencies between physical and juridical data, conditions that underscore the importance of legal certainty in the governance of land rights. In response, the Government of Indonesia has pursued the digital transformation of land services, including electronic certificates and integrated land databases, as part of its broader bureaucratic reform agenda. This study aims to analyze how the digital transformation of land administration strengthens the application of Good Land Governance principles and enhances legal certainty over land rights, while identifying the challenges that continue to constrain its implementation. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches, examining primary legal materials, including the 1945 Constitution, the Basic Agrarian Law, Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, and the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 of 2021, alongside secondary legal literature. The findings show that digital transformation strengthens transparency, accountability, effectiveness, efficiency, and legal certainty in land administration, while reducing opportunities for maladministration and document fraud. However, its success remains constrained by uneven technological infrastructure, cybersecurity risks, personal-data-protection requirements, limited inter-agency interoperability, and uneven human-resource readiness, all of which require continued regulatory and institutional strengthening.
Co-Authors