Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Between Normative Doctrine and Social Reality: Reinterpreting Kafa'ah in Indonesian Islamic Marriage Practices Asman Asman; Mohamed Aamer
Journal of Dual Legal Systems Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Dual Legal Systems
Publisher : STAI Syekh Abdur Rauf, Aceh Singkil

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/jdls.v3i1.534

Abstract

The concept of kafa'ah in marriage is an important principle in Islamic family law, emphasizing equality between prospective husband and wife. In Muslim social practices, this concept is not only understood from a normative-religious perspective but is also influenced by social, cultural, economic, and social status dynamics. This study aims to analyze the concept of kafa'ah from a socio-legal perspective by examining the relationship between Islamic legal norms and the social realities of marital practice. The method used is a qualitative approach with a juridical-sociological approach, examining legal norms in Islamic jurisprudence literature, legislation, and the social practices of Muslim communities. The results show that classically, kafa'ah encompasses equality in religion, lineage, social status, profession, and economic capacity. Scholars of various schools of thought have differing views regarding these elements, but generally place shared religion and moral commitment as key aspects. From a socio-legal perspective, the application of this concept has undergone transformation along with changes in social structures and the development of modern values, leading to a shift in traditional aspects such as lineage and social status. National law, through the Compilation of Islamic Law, emphasizes harmony and concord without explicitly regulating kafa'ah (comparative agreement). The resulting policy implications highlight the need for a reformulation of Islamic family law guidelines that are adaptive to social dynamics, emphasizing psychological, economic, and religious compatibility. Furthermore, religious courts need to integrate a socio-legal approach into their practice through contextual technical guidelines. This research is expected to contribute to the development of responsive Islamic family law studies. [Konsep kafa’ah dalam perkawinan merupakan prinsip penting dalam hukum keluarga Islam yang menekankan kesetaraan antara calon suami dan istri. Dalam praktik sosial masyarakat Muslim, konsep ini tidak hanya dipahami secara normatif-keagamaan, tetapi juga dipengaruhi oleh dinamika sosial, budaya, ekonomi, dan status sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konsep kafa’ah melalui perspektif sosio-legal dengan menelaah keterkaitan antara norma hukum Islam dan realitas sosial dalam praktik perkawinan. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian yuridis-sosiologis, yaitu mengkaji norma hukum dalam literatur fikih, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta praktik sosial masyarakat Muslim. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara klasik, kafa’ah mencakup kesetaraan dalam agama, nasab, status sosial, profesi, dan kemampuan ekonomi. Para ulama mazhab memiliki perbedaan pandangan terkait unsur-unsur tersebut, namun secara umum menempatkan kesamaan agama dan komitmen moral sebagai aspek utama. Dalam perspektif sosio-legal, penerapan konsep ini mengalami transformasi seiring perubahan struktur sosial dan perkembangan nilai modern, sehingga aspek tradisional seperti nasab dan status sosial mulai bergeser. Hukum nasional melalui Kompilasi Hukum Islam menekankan keserasian dan keharmonisan tanpa mengatur kafa’ah secara eksplisit. Implikasi kebijakan yang muncul adalah perlunya reformulasi pedoman hukum keluarga Islam yang adaptif terhadap dinamika sosial, dengan menekankan kompatibilitas psikologis, ekonomi, dan keagamaan. Selain itu, peradilan agama perlu mengintegrasikan pendekatan sosio-legal dalam praktiknya melalui pedoman teknis yang kontekstual. Penelitian ini diharapkan berkontribusi dalam pengembangan kajian hukum keluarga Islam yang responsif.]
Pemberdayaan Ketahanan Keluarga Berbasis Hak dan Kewajiban Suami Istri pada TP-PKK Desa Sebangun Asman Asman
Irajagaddhita Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Irajagaddhita : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Publisher : CV Global Research Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59996/irajagaddhita.v4i1.991

Abstract

The socialization activity that supports family resilience within the framework of husband and wife rights and obligations at the Family Welfare Movement (TP PKK) in Sebangun Village, Sebawi District, Sambas Regency is a strategic effort to strengthen the family as the smallest social unit that influences the quality of community life. This activity is motivated by the persistence of differences in understanding regarding the rights, obligations, responsibilities, and division of roles between husband and wife that have the potential to affect household harmony and family well-being. The objective of this activity is to increase the understanding of PKK members regarding the principles of family resilience that encompass psychological, social, economic, and spiritual aspects based on state legal norms and local community moral values. The implementation method uses a lecture and discussion approach. The lecture method is used to convey material related to the rights and obligations of husband and wife based on Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and its amendments, as well as the values of local wisdom of Sambas culture that emphasize deliberation, cooperation, and role balance in the family. Meanwhile, the discussion method is applied through a question and answer session and exchange of participants' experiences to identify factors that influence family resilience, such as ineffective communication, economic problems, and low understanding of family law. The results of the activity demonstrated an increased understanding among participants regarding the ideal husband-wife relationship, balanced role distribution, and constructive conflict resolution. Thus, this activity contributes to strengthening women's capacity as agents of change toward harmonious, resilient, and prosperous families, and has the potential to serve as a model for family empowerment in other areas.
The Struggle between Customary Law and Islamic Law in the Distribution of Inheritance of Melayu Communities on the Indonesia-Malaysia Border in Sambas, West Kalimantan Asman Asman
Qanun: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/qanun.v4i1.39301

Abstract

The revelation of the verses of the Qur'an regarding inheritance affirms that men and women have equal status as heirs, as stipulated in Surah An-Nisa verses 11-12. This provision reflects the principle of justice in Islamic law through the recognition and protection of women's rights. However, in the social practices of the Malay inland community of Sambas, there is still a discrepancy between Islamic legal norms and customary practices. The distribution of inheritance tends to be carried out equally between boys and girls, on the grounds of social justice and equality, without referring to the proportional provisions in sharia. This study is a field study with a phenomenological approach to understand the construction of the meaning of justice in the inheritance practices of Malay border communities. The results show that equal distribution of inheritance is considered fair because it aligns with cultural values, family solidarity, and the collective conscience of the community. This tradition has been deeply rooted and has gained social legitimacy across generations. The research gap in this study lies in the lack of studies that specifically examine the dialectic between Islamic inheritance law and customary practices in Malay border communities, especially from the perspective of subjective experience and the construction of the meaning of local justice. The novelty of this research lies in its interpretive analysis of local culturally based concepts of justice interacting with sharia norms, resulting in a new understanding of how border communities reconstruct inheritance justice amidst the tension between normative texts and social reality.