p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IIJSE
Tubagus Muhammad Yusuf Khudri
Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluation of Risk Culture Implementation in the Digital Investment Company PT XYZ Fanny Wiryana; Tubagus Muhammad Yusuf Khudri
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the risk culture at digital investment company PT XYZ using the The Institute of Risk Management (IRM) 2012 framework. The research employs a case study design with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and surveys. At the individual level, analysis was conducted using the Risk Type Compass and Moral DNA instruments. The Risk Type Compass results indicate that employees at PT XYZ tend to exhibit a relatively balanced tolerance across most risk types. PT XYZ shows a combination of adventurous–deliberate traits (bold yet calm and stable) as well as prudent–intense tendencies (careful and conscientious). Based on the Moral DNA analysis, employees at PT XYZ demonstrate a predominant inclination toward reason ethics in their decision-making processes. At the organizational level, analysis through interviews and the Double S Model shows that PT XYZ’s culture falls into the communal category, indicating high levels of social cohesion and solidarity within the organization. Furthermore, evaluation using the eight aspects of the IRM Risk Culture Aspects Model reveals several areas that require improvement, specifically in the following aspects Risk Leadership, Responding to Bad News, Risk Governance, and Risk Resources. Meanwhile, the aspects that are already considered to be relatively strong include Risk Transparency, Risk Competence, Risk Decisions, and Rewarding Appropriate Risk Taking.
Evaluating the K-Cash Pilot Trial in Mutual Fund Transactions: A User-Centric Perspective Afrindah Eka Ramadhani; Tubagus Muhammad Yusuf Khudri
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 9 No 2 (2026): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v9i2.9299

Abstract

This study examines the initial institutional user acceptance of the K-CASH (KSEI Cash Management System) during its pilot testing phase in mutual fund transactions. The initiative to develop K-CASH stems from the growing need to digitalize fund settlement processes that traditionally rely on virtual accounts, manual proof-of-transfer verification, and reconciliation procedures conducted by Custodian Banks, mechanisms that are susceptible to mismatches and may prolong the settlement cycle. The system, which is built upon the Investor Fund Unit Account (IFUA) structure, introduces real-time balance validation, automated fund locking, unit validation, and integrated settlement instructions through S-INVEST. Employing a qualitative case study approach, this research adopts the UTAUT framework, comprising performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, and the interview findings suggest the presence of behavioral intention among users. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with five institutional users at PT X, complemented by pilot testing documentation. The findings indicate that users perceive K-CASH as a system with substantial potential to enhance operational efficiency by reducing reconciliation workloads and minimizing mismatches, despite the presence of several technical issues such as reporting filter errors. The system is generally considered user-friendly, supported by effective internal coordination and managerial endorsement. Regulatory influence was also identified as a critical driver of participation, positioning PT X as an early institutional adopter. Nonetheless, the study identifies significant external gaps, including limited industry participation, dependence on cross-institutional integration readiness, and the need for clearer regulatory mandates and transition guidelines. These factors suggest that the full-scale implementation of K-CASH will require not only internal institutional preparedness but also decisive regulatory support and broader industry alignment. Furthermore, interview results reveal the emergence of behavioral intention among users to adopt K-CASH once system stability and regulatory clarity are achieved. This study contributes to the literature on technology adoption in capital market infrastructures and provides practical implications for refining the full implementation strategy of K-CASH.