Charles Berebon
Rivers State University, Nigeria

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Justice, Truth, and Legal Rationality: A Leibnizian Perspective on Modern Jurisprudence Charles Berebon
Law and Social Justice in Society Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Letiges

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35723/lsjs.v1i1.51

Abstract

This essay examines the relevance of Leibniz's philosophy of law for modern jurisprudence, emphasising his contributions to legal reasoning, justice, and truth. Leibniz's distinction between necessary and contingent truths, his theory of legal proof, and his multi-level approach to law—integrating strict law, equity, and morality—offer valuable insights into contemporary legal thought. His vision of a characteristic universalis, a logical system for structuring legal reasoning, anticipates modern formal methods in law. A comparison with Ronald Dworkin's legal philosophy highlights their shared commitment to objective legal principles and the integration of morality into law. While Leibniz employs formal logic and conceptual analysis, Dworkin's approach focuses on interpretive reasoning. By bridging these perspectives, this essay argues for synthesising analytical jurisprudence and natural law, demonstrating how Leibniz's ideas can help unify legal reasoning across different legal traditions and contribute to the pursuit of justice.
Advancing Equal Protection and Regulatory Solutions for an Inclusive Civic Education Charles Berebon
Amicus Curiae: Journal of Law and Justice Dialogue Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Amicus Curiae: Journal of Law and Justice Dialogue

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66229/amcu.12

Abstract

This article explores the teaching of civic engagement in academic environments, focusing on its potential to generate new knowledge and inspire social and personal action. It advocates for regulatory measures to ensure a fair and balanced curriculum that supports diverse perspectives and fosters productive discourse, encouraging active student participation in civic life. Rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, which guarantees equal treatment and opportunities, the article underscores the importance of giving all students a well-rounded education. Applying these principles, the article calls for a more equitable civic education system that empowers students to contribute meaningfully to their communities. The proposed regulatory remedies aim to create a curriculum that embraces diverse worldviews, promoting open and respectful discussions among students. This inclusive approach fosters critical thinking and helps students gain a deeper understanding of different perspectives, which can enhance their civic engagement. Additionally, the article highlights the need for safeguards against biased or exclusionary educational practices, ensuring that all students, regardless of background or belief, have equal access to educational opportunities. Dismantling barriers and fostering fairness will help equip students with the knowledge and skills needed to participate in their communities actively. Through the lens of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection, the article advocates for legal and regulatory solutions that ensure a well-rounded, balanced curriculum that reflects a broad range of worldviews.