Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Education and Government Wiyata Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Risko Ari Saputra
UIN Palangka Raya, Palangka Raya, Indonesia
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KOMPARASI METODOLOGI DAN CORAK PENAFSIRAN DALAM KITAB AL-ASAS FI AL-TAFSIR DAN KITAB AL-BAHR AL-MUHITH Risko Ari Saputra; Evi Aulia; Ahmad Dasuki
Journal Education and Government Wiyata Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Panca Bakti Wiyata Pangandaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71128/e-gov.v4i1.354

Abstract

This study examines a comparative analysis of the methodology and interpretive orientations employed in Al-Asas fi al-Tafsir by Sa‘id Hawwa and Al-Bahr al-Muhith by Abu Hayyan al-Andalusi. These two Qur’anic commentaries represent different periods and tendencies within the tradition of Qur’anic exegesis, namely classical and modern tafsir. The study aims to identify the interpretive methodologies adopted by each exegete, explore their dominant interpretive orientations, and analyze the similarities and differences between them. This research adopts a qualitative approach through library research. The primary sources consist of Al-Asas fi al-Tafsir and Al-Bahr al-Muhith, while secondary sources include relevant books and scholarly articles. Data analysis is conducted using a descriptive-comparative method by examining the methodologies, interpretive characteristics, and selected examples of exegesis found in both works. The findings reveal that Sa‘id Hawwa employs a tahlili method with a strong emphasis on the thematic unity of the Qur’an (al-wahdah al-qur’aniyyah), alongside a tarbawi, da‘wah-oriented, and spiritual interpretive approach that is responsive to modern challenges. In contrast, Abu Hayyan al-Andalusi applies a tahlili method characterized by a dominant lughawi orientation, particularly in his detailed analysis of Arabic grammar (nahw), morphology (sarf), and rhetoric (balaghah), while demonstrating caution toward scientific interpretations of the Qur’an. These methodological and interpretive differences indicate that Qur’anic exegesis is closely shaped by the intellectual context and the needs of the Muslim community in each historical period. This study is expected to contribute to the field of Qur’anic studies by enriching scholarly discourse on the dynamics of exegetical methodology from the classical to the modern era.
Fenomena Mandi Lumpur : Analisis Multidisiplin dan Relevansi Hadist Larangan Berbuat Zholim Rizal; Risko Ari Saputra
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Juni 2026)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2086

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of the exploitation of vulnerable communities on digital platforms, specifically the practice of "online begging" on TikTok, through the reactualization of the Hadith Qudsi on the prohibition of injustice (dhulm). In the midst of rapid digitalization, human suffering is frequently commodified into profane entertainment content, signaling a moral crisis in cyber-space. This research aims to dissect this phenomenon not merely as a common ethical violation, but as a form of systemic injustice that disrupts the social order. Utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, this study integrates three scholarly perspectives: Émile Durkheim’s sociology to observe the decay of social solidarity, John Rawls’s philosophy to criticize the disparity of justice (fairness), and Imam al-Shatibi’s Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah to evaluate the violation of the hierarchy of human welfare. The results indicate that digital exploitation is a form of injustice that prioritizes the acquisition of wealth over the protection of life and human dignity (Hifz al-Nafs). This research concludes that the Hadith on the prohibition of injustice must be transformed from a mere normative text into a practical guide to reconstruct the character of digital citizens to be more humane, just, and compliant with the priority scale of public interest over individual materialistic ambitions.
Co-Authors Ahmad Dasuki Evi Aulia Rizal