Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities
Md. Yeasir Arafat
Undergraduate student, Department of Political Science, University of Rajshahi
Humanities Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
History, Agendas, and Anomalies of Bangladesh Politics Md. Yeasir Arafat; Fahmida
DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Innovation in Education and Social Sciences Research
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/dirosat.v3i2.158

Abstract

This article explores the political journey of Bangladesh from its birth in 1971 to the difficult present, like a long and winding river shaped by storms of ambition, ideology, and outside influence. After gaining independence, the country dreamed of unity, rebuilding, and democracy. But over time, those hopes were shaken by repeated waves of political instability, military rule, and weak attempts to build lasting democracy. Political agendas changed again and again, like a swinging pendulum moving between dreams of economic growth and infrastructure. Yet, these goals were often blocked by corruption, family-based control of power, and unfair elections. The story of democracy in Bangladesh has not only been written by elected leaders but also shaped by powerful unelected groups such as the military, business elites, and foreign powers. Each of them has left their mark on the country’s political path. As the nation moved between secular ideals and the rise of religion in politics, its institutions became weaker, burdened by political bias and growing public distrust. At the center of all these are deep political problems, like cracks in a building’s foundation, which have blocked the path toward a fair and fully representative democracy. This article also looks closely at these problems and shows how they still affect political choices and make it harder for Bangladesh to build a strong and stable democratic future.
Between Theocratic Republic and Democracy: Government Systems in Iran, the USA, and the UK Md. Yeasir Arafat; Sahed Siddiq; Anik Kumar Ghosh; Saurov Kumar Shil
DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Innovation in Education and Social Sciences Research
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/dirosat.v4i1.203

Abstract

From monarchs and presidents to supreme religious leaders, the architecture of power varies—but its essence shapes the fate of nations. This study presents a comparative analysis of the government systems of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom. It focuses specifically on the structures and functions of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches in each country. While the USA and UK represent two distinct models of democratic governance—a federal republic and a constitutional monarchy respectively—Iran’s theocratic republic offers a unique blend of religious and political authority. Through a structured examination of institutional design, constitutional principles, and practical dynamics, this research reveals both convergences and contrasts among the three systems. The findings highlight how ideological foundations—secular liberalism in the West and Islamic jurisprudence in Iran—significantly shape institutional behavior and power distribution. The study concludes with reflections on the implications of these differences for governance, accountability, and the rule of law.
Co-Authors Anik Kumar Ghosh Fahmida Sahed Siddiq Saurov Kumar Shil