I Made Ady Wirawan
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

The Ocular Toll of Drug Tourism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cannabis and Methamphetamine Impact on Retinal Architecture and Pupillary Dynamics Fransiska Lavinia Gracella; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita; I Made Ady Wirawan
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i5.1584

Abstract

Background: Drug tourism involves individuals traveling across international borders to access recreational illicit substances. While psychiatric and cardiovascular toxicities of substances like cannabis and methamphetamine are established, quantitative data regarding their impact on ocular microstructures and functional dynamics remain scarce. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the structural and functional ocular alterations induced by these substances. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis complying with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were conducted. Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to January 2026. Data extraction targeted pupillary dynamics and structural optical coherence tomography measurements. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was utilized in Review Manager 5.4 to pool continuous data, calculating Standardized Mean Differences and 95% Confidence Intervals. Heterogeneity was evaluated via the I-squared statistic. Results: Nine primary research articles were included. The mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 8.1, indicating a low risk of bias. Chronic cannabis users exhibited significantly reduced pupillary constriction velocity (Standardized Mean Difference -0.85, 95% Confidence Interval -1.20 to -0.50, p < 0.001), prolonged reaction latency (Standardized Mean Difference 0.65, 95% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 1.00, p < 0.01), and decreased corneal endothelial cell density (Standardized Mean Difference -0.78, 95% Confidence Interval -1.15 to -0.41, p < 0.001). Methamphetamine abuse was associated with profound global retinal nerve fiber layer thinning (Standardized Mean Difference -1.12, 95% Confidence Interval -1.55 to -0.69, p < 0.001) and reduced minimum rim width (Standardized Mean Difference -0.95, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Recreational cannabis and methamphetamine abuse cause significant, quantifiable ocular morbidity. Methamphetamine induces ischemic neurodegenerative retinal loss, while cannabis disrupts autonomic pupillary pathways and corneal integrity. Comprehensive ophthalmological screening is critical for individuals with substance abuse histories.
Intraocular Pressure Dynamics and Ischaemic Risks During Air Travel Post-Gas Tamponade: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Vina Yuwanda; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita; I Made Ady Wirawan
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1606

Abstract

Background: Gas tamponade is a widely used surgical intervention for retinal detachment repair. However, intraocular gas bubbles expand at altitude owing to Boyle's law, potentially causing severe intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and ischaemic complications. The safety of air travel for patients with residual intraocular gas remains insufficiently characterised. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of empirical and computational studies examining IOP dynamics during simulated or actual altitude exposure in eyes with intraocular gas. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed Central through March 2024 for peer-reviewed publications without language restrictions. Study selection followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines with predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted in duplicate, and risk of bias assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses stratified findings by study type. Results: The primary analysis included three empirical studies (n = 47 eyes) showing IOP increase of SMD = 3.03 (95% CI: 2.18–3.89; I² = 17.16%, τ² = 0.11). Sensitivity analysis including all four studies (one computational model) yielded SMD = 4.67 (95% CI: 1.52–7.82; I² = 95.67%, τ² = 9.81). Individual study estimates ranged from SMD = 2.52 (Mills 2001) to SMD = 8.65 (Gsellman 2016, computational). Risk of bias was generally low to moderate. No significant publication bias was detected. Conclusion: Patients with residual intraocular gas who undertake air travel face meaningful IOP elevation at altitude. The risk of anterior segment ischaemic complications warrants careful patient counselling, altitude restriction recommendations, and prophylactic pharmacotherapy. Future prospective studies should evaluate optimal clinical protocols.
High-Altitude Maculopathy in Mountaineers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rataya Paramitha Maliawan; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1613

Abstract

Background: High-altitude maculopathy (HAM) represents a distinct form of high-altitude retinopathy affecting mountaineers at extreme elevations. Despite increased mountaineering activity, the prevalence and clinical significance of HAM remain poorly characterised in systematic reviews. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and manual review of reference lists through April 2026. Eligible studies were prospective and retrospective cohorts reporting HAM prevalence in mountaineers at altitude ≥3,500 metres. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis employed the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects modelling. Results: Three prospective studies (n=50 mountaineers) were analysed with a pooled prevalence of 73.37% (95% confidence interval: 60.28–84.72%). Heterogeneity was absent (I²=0%, Q=0.78, p=0.678). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher prevalence at extreme altitude (≥5,000 m: 78.6%) versus very high altitude (3,500–4,999 m: 70%). Sensitivity ranged 67.48–83.76%. Funnel plot inspection revealed no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: Approximately three-quarters of mountaineers experience HAM at high altitude, with prevalence increasing at extreme elevations. HAM represents a common but underrecognised altitude-related ocular complication. Future prospective studies should employ standardised diagnostic criteria and investigate the mechanistic pathways of macular involvement.
The Unseen Danger: A Meta-Analysis of Bystander Injuries in Firework-Related Ocular Trauma Rania Ayu Permata Putri Kornia; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i10.1409

Abstract

Background: Firework-related ocular trauma represents a significant, preventable cause of severe vision loss, with incidence rates peaking during global cultural and national festivals. While the risks to active firework users are well-established, the burden of injury sustained by passive spectators, or bystanders, remains poorly quantified. This study aimed to synthesize global data to define the magnitude of this unseen danger. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2015 and December 2025 that reported separable data on firework-related ocular injuries in bystanders and operators. A random-effects model calculated the pooled proportion of bystander injuries. Secondary outcomes included pooled odds ratios (ORs) for open globe injury (OGI) and severe vision loss (SVL; Visual Acuity <3/60). Results: Eleven studies, encompassing 2,440 patients, met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis, despite significant heterogeneity in the source data (I² = 89%), suggests that nearly half of all victims were bystanders, with a pooled proportion of 47.5% (95% CI: 41.8%–53.2%). Bystanders had significantly lower odds of sustaining an OGI compared to operators (pooled OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.90). However, the odds of suffering permanent SVL were not statistically different between the two groups (pooled OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.73–1.14), indicating a comparable risk of blinding injury. Conclusion: These findings must be interpreted with caution due to high inter-study heterogeneity and unmeasured clinical confounders. Nonetheless, the analysis strongly suggests that the risk to bystanders is unacceptably high and that public health paradigms focused solely on operator safety are insufficient. This study underscores the urgent need for prospective, standardized data collection and a shift in prevention strategies toward protecting passive spectators.
Ocular Parasitoses in the Globally Mobile Population: A Systematic Review of Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management Ervan Suryanti Umbu Lapu; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Julari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i10.1411

Abstract

Background: The unprecedented scale of global travel has amplified the diagnostic challenge of ocular parasitoses in non-endemic regions. These infections, while rare, can cause severe visual morbidity and are often misdiagnosed. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence on parasitic eye infections in international travelers to create a comprehensive, state-of-the-art resource for clinicians. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The search included terms for parasitic eye diseases and international travelers. All case reports, case series, and observational studies published in English detailing confirmed ocular parasitic infections in patients with a history of international travel were eligible. Data on demographics, travel, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management were extracted from all eligible studies, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. A qualitative narrative synthesis of the findings was performed. Results: From an initial 1,408 records, 19 studies met the full inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. These studies detailed infections from a wide range of helminthic and protozoan pathogens, including Loa loa, Dirofilaria spp., Thelazia callipaeda, Gnathostoma spp., Onchocerca volvulus, Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma cruzi, Acanthamoeba spp., and Taenia solium (cysticercosis). Infections were acquired across Africa, Asia, and the Americas. Clinical presentations were highly diverse, ranging from migrating subconjunctival worms to sight-threatening chorioretinitis, keratitis, and intraocular cysts. Diagnosis consistently relied on a combination of high-magnification biomicroscopy, advanced serological and molecular assays like PCR, and targeted imaging. Management was pathogen-specific, involving microsurgical extraction for accessible helminths and tailored antimicrobial therapy for protozoan and systemic infections. Conclusion: Ocular parasitoses represent a critical diagnostic challenge in returning travelers. A detailed travel and exposure history is the single most important tool to guide the differential diagnosis. Effective management requires a high index of suspicion and a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach to prevent irreversible vision loss.
Optic Neuritis After Viral Vector versus mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis Tiara Alexander; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i10.1412

Abstract

Background: The global deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, utilizing distinct viral vector and mRNA technologies, has been followed by reports of rare neuro-ophthalmic adverse events, including optic neuritis (ON). This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical phenotypes, autoimmune serological profiles, and visual outcomes of ON cases with onset in temporal association with viral vector versus mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases for case reports and case series published up to August 2025 detailing ON after COVID-19 vaccination. Data were extracted on clinical presentation, MRI findings, serostatus for aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) antibodies, treatments, and visual outcomes. Separate meta-analyses of proportions and comparative odds ratios (OR) were calculated for key outcomes, including distinct analyses for NMOSD and MOGAD. Results: Our analysis of published reports included 20 studies, comprising 90 patients (40 viral vector, 50 mRNA). Cases associated with viral vector vaccines had significantly higher odds of presenting with bilateral disease (OR 4.31, 95% CI [1.67, 11.11]). This platform was also associated with markedly increased odds of AQP4-IgG positivity (NMOSD) (OR 5.15, 95% CI [1.35, 19.61]) and MOG-IgG positivity (MOGAD) (OR 4.58, 95% CI [1.09, 19.21]). Consequently, these patients had higher odds of requiring aggressive immunotherapy and of suffering incomplete visual recovery (OR 3.41, 95% CI [1.14, 10.21]). Conclusion: Our analysis of published case reports suggests that while ON following COVID-19 vaccination is a very rare event, its clinical phenotype may differ based on the vaccine platform. Cases associated with viral vector vaccines appear more likely to manifest as a severe, bilateral, antibody-mediated condition characteristic of NMOSD or MOGAD. These findings, which do not establish causality, underscore the critical importance of prompt autoantibody testing to guide appropriate management. The established benefits of vaccination continue to overwhelmingly outweigh the exceptionally low absolute risk of such adverse events.
The Hidden Hazard of Celebration: A Meta-Analysis of Ocular Morbidity from Colored Powder Festivals and Implications for Global Travel Medicine Frangklin Refelino Jotlely; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i10.1417

Abstract

Background: The globalization of colored powder festivals, such as Holi, has exposed millions, including international tourists, to significant ocular health risks from synthetic industrial dyes that have replaced traditional organic powders. This study was conducted to quantify the prevalence of acute ocular morbidities from these festivals, providing an evidence base to inform clinical practice and public health policy, particularly within travel medicine. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest for observational studies published up to July 2024. Studies reporting ocular complications from colored powder exposure were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using JBI checklists. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence for key ocular injuries. Heterogeneity was investigated using sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. Results: Six studies from India, encompassing 189 patients, met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The patient population was predominantly young males (mean age 20-30 years). The meta-analysis revealed a high pooled prevalence of key ocular morbidities. The prevalence for chemical conjunctivitis was 95% (95% CI: 87%-100%), though with substantial but anticipated heterogeneity (I²=82%). The prevalence for corneal epithelial defects was 37% (95% CI: 23%-53%; I²=45%), and for superficial punctate keratopathy was 75% (95% CI: 57%-90%; I²=0%). Most injuries were bilateral. Conclusion: Participation in colored powder festivals, based on extensive evidence from Holi in India, presents a quantifiable and significant risk of acute ocular morbidity. The high prevalence of chemical-induced ocular surface disease necessitates urgent recognition of this "hidden hazard." Proactive, evidence-based preventive strategies, including tiered recommendations for protective eyewear and updated pre-travel health advisories, are imperative to safeguard the vision of millions of celebrants worldwide.
The Ocular Toll of Drug Tourism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cannabis and Methamphetamine Impact on Retinal Architecture and Pupillary Dynamics Fransiska Lavinia Gracella; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita; I Made Ady Wirawan
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i5.1584

Abstract

Background: Drug tourism involves individuals traveling across international borders to access recreational illicit substances. While psychiatric and cardiovascular toxicities of substances like cannabis and methamphetamine are established, quantitative data regarding their impact on ocular microstructures and functional dynamics remain scarce. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the structural and functional ocular alterations induced by these substances. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis complying with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were conducted. Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to January 2026. Data extraction targeted pupillary dynamics and structural optical coherence tomography measurements. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was utilized in Review Manager 5.4 to pool continuous data, calculating Standardized Mean Differences and 95% Confidence Intervals. Heterogeneity was evaluated via the I-squared statistic. Results: Nine primary research articles were included. The mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 8.1, indicating a low risk of bias. Chronic cannabis users exhibited significantly reduced pupillary constriction velocity (Standardized Mean Difference -0.85, 95% Confidence Interval -1.20 to -0.50, p < 0.001), prolonged reaction latency (Standardized Mean Difference 0.65, 95% Confidence Interval 0.30 to 1.00, p < 0.01), and decreased corneal endothelial cell density (Standardized Mean Difference -0.78, 95% Confidence Interval -1.15 to -0.41, p < 0.001). Methamphetamine abuse was associated with profound global retinal nerve fiber layer thinning (Standardized Mean Difference -1.12, 95% Confidence Interval -1.55 to -0.69, p < 0.001) and reduced minimum rim width (Standardized Mean Difference -0.95, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Recreational cannabis and methamphetamine abuse cause significant, quantifiable ocular morbidity. Methamphetamine induces ischemic neurodegenerative retinal loss, while cannabis disrupts autonomic pupillary pathways and corneal integrity. Comprehensive ophthalmological screening is critical for individuals with substance abuse histories.
Intraocular Pressure Dynamics and Ischaemic Risks During Air Travel Post-Gas Tamponade: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Vina Yuwanda; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita; I Made Ady Wirawan
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1606

Abstract

Background: Gas tamponade is a widely used surgical intervention for retinal detachment repair. However, intraocular gas bubbles expand at altitude owing to Boyle's law, potentially causing severe intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and ischaemic complications. The safety of air travel for patients with residual intraocular gas remains insufficiently characterised. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of empirical and computational studies examining IOP dynamics during simulated or actual altitude exposure in eyes with intraocular gas. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed Central through March 2024 for peer-reviewed publications without language restrictions. Study selection followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines with predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted in duplicate, and risk of bias assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses stratified findings by study type. Results: The primary analysis included three empirical studies (n = 47 eyes) showing IOP increase of SMD = 3.03 (95% CI: 2.18–3.89; I² = 17.16%, τ² = 0.11). Sensitivity analysis including all four studies (one computational model) yielded SMD = 4.67 (95% CI: 1.52–7.82; I² = 95.67%, τ² = 9.81). Individual study estimates ranged from SMD = 2.52 (Mills 2001) to SMD = 8.65 (Gsellman 2016, computational). Risk of bias was generally low to moderate. No significant publication bias was detected. Conclusion: Patients with residual intraocular gas who undertake air travel face meaningful IOP elevation at altitude. The risk of anterior segment ischaemic complications warrants careful patient counselling, altitude restriction recommendations, and prophylactic pharmacotherapy. Future prospective studies should evaluate optimal clinical protocols.
High-Altitude Maculopathy in Mountaineers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rataya Paramitha Maliawan; I Made Ady Wirawan; I Gusti Ayu Made Juliari; Ida Ayu Ary Pramita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 6 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i6.1613

Abstract

Background: High-altitude maculopathy (HAM) represents a distinct form of high-altitude retinopathy affecting mountaineers at extreme elevations. Despite increased mountaineering activity, the prevalence and clinical significance of HAM remain poorly characterised in systematic reviews. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and manual review of reference lists through April 2026. Eligible studies were prospective and retrospective cohorts reporting HAM prevalence in mountaineers at altitude ≥3,500 metres. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis employed the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects modelling. Results: Three prospective studies (n=50 mountaineers) were analysed with a pooled prevalence of 73.37% (95% confidence interval: 60.28–84.72%). Heterogeneity was absent (I²=0%, Q=0.78, p=0.678). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher prevalence at extreme altitude (≥5,000 m: 78.6%) versus very high altitude (3,500–4,999 m: 70%). Sensitivity ranged 67.48–83.76%. Funnel plot inspection revealed no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: Approximately three-quarters of mountaineers experience HAM at high altitude, with prevalence increasing at extreme elevations. HAM represents a common but underrecognised altitude-related ocular complication. Future prospective studies should employ standardised diagnostic criteria and investigate the mechanistic pathways of macular involvement.