Sinar Aju Wulandari
Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Indications of Unfair Business Competition in Tiktok's Acquisition of Tokopedia Shares Pryanka Humaira Febriandhara; Sinar Aju Wulandari
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JANUARY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i1.2108

Abstract

The development of digital technology has driven significant transformation in the business world, including the emergence of e-commerce as a new form of trade activity. One of the cases that has arisen as a result of this development is the acquisition of Tokopedia shares by TikTok. This acquisition is considered to indicate potential unfair business competition. This research aims to analyze whether the acquisition of Tokopedia shares by TikTok shows signs of unfair business competition and whether there have been legal measures taken by the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) in response. The research employs a statute approach, a case study, and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that there are signs of unfair business competition in the acquisition of Tokopedia by TikTok. KPPU has also carried out its supervisory function by conducting an assessment and issuing a conditional approval as part of its efforts to maintain fair business competition.
Granting Exclusive Right to Provide the Base Transceiver Station Tower in a Regency Reviewed from The Competition Law Tessana Pridia Paramitha; Sinar Aju Wulandari
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i2.1672

Abstract

The Badung Regency Government in 2007 made an agreement with a company which gave exclusive rights to that company as the only business actor permitted to build and manage Base Transceiver Station (BTS) towers in Badung Regency. This agreement prohibited the Badung Government from granting tower permits to other companies. The action taken by the Badung Government created barriers for other companies attempting to enter the BTS tower industry in Badung Regency. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to analyze barriers to entry in the BTS tower leasing market in Badung Regency. This research will analyze monopolistic practices in BTS tower leasing in Badung Regency based on the provisions regulated in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. This research uses normative legal research methods with statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the existence of exclusive rights to provide BTS towers in Badung Regency raised barriers to entry into the BTS tower leasing business. These entry barriers caused the company that was given exclusive rights to have a monopoly position in the leasing of BTS towers in Badung Regency. This condition has negative impacts on other business actors, consumers, and the Badung community.
The Responsibility of Crane Company in terms of The Loss Occurred during The Sea’s Transport Activity Based on Indonesia’s Civil Law Ardo Alkautsar; Sinar Aju Wulandari; Zahry Vandawati Chumaida
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JULY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i3.1739

Abstract

Transportation activities, whether by land, air or sea, involve parties involved in the transportation process. The parties in the transportation activity have different legal obligations. Different legal obligations can be viewed from the different legal relationships that arise between the parties in transportation and the roles of the parties in transportation. In sea transportation, there are many parties involved with each other and it is even possible to have a legal relationship with parties who are not directly involved in the sea transportation, such as a crane company that is present only to rent crane equipment to the loading and unloading company so that loading and unloading activities can be carried out, which also does not rule out the possibility that the loading and unloading company can create a legal relationship with other parties in the transportation process. In transportation, the parties can also use insurance for both the activities or interests of the transportation process with the aim of reducing the risk of loss that can arise in transportation activities or other events during transportation activities. Within this study, the legal and operational responsibilities of crane companies functioning as intermediary service providers in maritime transportation are being investigated. Using normative legal research methodology with statute and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes Indonesian laws, regulations, and legal materials related to crane company responsibilities in maritime operations. The findings reveal that crane companies bear liability for operational losses, must provide suitable equipment, and should utilize insurance protection for risk transfer.
Protecting Satellite Telecommunication by Limiting the Use of Anti-Satellite Weapons Under International Space Law Kania Maharani; Aktieva Tri Tjitrawati; Sinar Aju Wulandari
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i4.1934

Abstract

The increasing utilization of outer space has brought about unprecedented opportunities and potential security challenges. The development of anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons has raised concerns about the militarization of space and the potential for conflict. This research examines the legal framework governing ASAT weapons under international space law, focusing on the Outer Space Treaty (OST) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio Regulations. It analyzes the limitations of existing legal instruments in addressing the threats posed by ASATs, particularly their potential to generate space debris and disrupt critical satellite infrastructure. This research adopts normative (doctrinal) legal methods by incorporating statutes and conceptual frameworks to analyze primary and secondary legal sources in order to investigate legal standards regarding militarization and disarmament in space. This research highlight that the current legal framework is insufficient to prevent the proliferation and use of ASAT weapons and proposes the development of a new international treaty specifically addressing ASATs. This treaty would provide clearer definitions, stricter regulations, and stronger enforcement mechanisms to ensure the long-term sustainability and security of space activities. This research also explores the role of the ITU in promoting the peaceful and responsible use of outer space through its Radio Regulations and technical expertise. The findings emphasize the need for greater cooperation between the ITU and other international organizations to address the challenges posed by ASAT weapons and ensure the continued benefits of space technology for all humankind.