Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and legisprudence
Susi Dian Rahayu
Universitas Islam 45
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Collaborative governance in empowering women in coastal areas in Bekasi regency Susi Dian Rahayu; Annisa Eka Nurjannah
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i10.649

Abstract

Collaborative governance is an appropriate concept for building community development through community empowerment. Empowerment activities are a good first step in building a strategy to achieve increased community welfare and the abilities of people who experience inadequate living. Segarajaya Village is a coastal village, and the majority of coastal communities have educational, social, and economic limitations. Women’s empowerment increases the skills and strengths that women have so that they can become independent and creative. This study aims to analyze how collaborative governance empowers women in Segarajaya Village through the Seraci batik craftsmen group. The theory used in this research is the collaboration theory from Ansel and Gash, which suggests that there are four indicators that influence the implementation of collaboration: initial conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, and collaborative process. This study uses qualitative research methods, with a descriptive approach. The results of this research show that the collaborative process of empowering women in coastal areas through the Seraci batik craftsman group in Segarajaya Village has gone quite well, although the implementation of collaborative governance is still not running optimally. Existing collaboration tends to be less flexible, lacks trust, and is dominated by the private sector, which becomes an obstacle to collaboration, resulting in the implementation of collaborative governance not being optimal.
Supreme Court Decision Number 34P/HUM/2022 and Efforts to Strengthen the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education Institutions Susi Dian Rahayu; Arifudin; Winarsih
The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): The Digest, June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/digest.v7i1.49535

Abstract

In response to the increasing prevalence of sexual violence cases in higher education institutions, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Higher Education issued Ministerial Regulation No. 30 of 2021 on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Violence in Higher Education Institutions. However, the regulation has sparked debate among the public, particularly regarding Article 5 (paragraph 2), which contains the phrase “without consent” a phrase deemed open to multiple interpretations, legalizing adultery, and contradicting societal norms and religious values. This controversy subsequently became the subject of a petition for judicial review at the Supreme Court in Case No. 34 P/HUM/2022, by the Minangkabau Traditional Council (LKAAM) of West Sumatra. However, in its ruling through Supreme Court Decision No. 34 P/HUM/2022, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition. This study examines about Supreme Court Decision Number 34/P/HUM/2022 and efforts to strengthen legal protection for the prevention and handling of sexual violence in higher education institutions. The theory used in this study is the Theory of Legal Protection by Philipus Hadjon. The research findings that, in relation to the prevention and handling of sexual violence in higher education institutions, the presence of Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Regulation Number 30 of 2021, reinforced by Supreme Court Decision Number 34 P/HUM/2022, provides both preventive and repressive legal protection.
Co-Authors Annisa Eka Nurjannah Arifudin Winarsih