Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Identity construction and violence in Malay-Patani ethnonationalism in the dynamics of violations of international humanitarian law Fiya Ainur Rohmatika; Ali Muhammad
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.716

Abstract

The Malay-Patani ethnonationalism conflict in Southern Thailand reflects the complex dynamics between identity construction, violence, and the violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The background to the conflict is rooted in the political, cultural, and religious marginalization of the Malay-Muslim community by a Thai state that emphasizes the homogeneity of the Thai-Buddhist national identity. The suppression of the Malay language, religious institutions, and collective historical memory led to armed resistance and escalation of violence in the region. This research aims to analyze in depth how the construction of the Malay-Patani identity contributes to violence and forms of violation of the basic principles of IHL, such as distinction, proportionality, and necessity. This study used a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach. Data were obtained through literature studies, reports from international organizations (International Committee of the Red Cross, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch), and critical discourse analysis of identity narratives and violence. The results show that the construction of identity suppressed by state policy results in the legitimization of violence by separatist groups, while the state also responds with repressive actions that violate international humanitarian norms. Both state and non-state actors have been involved in systematic violations of IHL, including attacks on civilians, torture, and the use of banned weapons.
Human Security and Coastal Diplomacy: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Australia in Managing Tourist Safety Fiya Ainur Rohmatika; Joko Sutopo
Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science Vol 5 No 03 (2026): Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jmws.v5i03.3290

Abstract

Coastal tourism safety presents a diplomatic human security agenda, especially for Indonesia as an archipelagic country (≈99,093 km of coastline) and Australia with its mature coastal safety regime. This study aims to assess how the principle of human security is translated into tourism safety governance and how Indonesia-Australia coastal diplomacy produces soft power. The methods used are comparative studies based on policy and document analysis (BPS; BPS-DIY; National Coastal Safety Report 2024; Plan of Action 2025–2029), descriptive statistics of visits, and institutional assessments. The results show a strong recovery in Indonesian tourist arrivals: 4.05 million (2020), 1.56 million (2021), 5.89 million (2022), 11.68 million (2023), and 13.90 million (2024). At the regional level, DIY recorded 9,699 foreign tourists in May 2025 (up 35.94% m/m), with a cumulative total of 32,823 visits from January to May, while domestic tourist movements reached 3,547,415 trips. In Australia, the Surf Life Saving network comprises ≈316 clubs with >198,000 members, 558 patrol services, and 8,857 rescues in 2023/24; epidemiological literature estimates a backwash-related mortality rate of ≈0.11 per million visits. Comparisons indicate a gap in the degree of institutionalization: Australia displays consistent standards, proficiency tests, and exposure-based reporting, while Indonesia still varies between regions. In conclusion, coastal tourism safety is a manifestation of human security which, through coastal diplomacy, generates reputational gains (soft power). Recommendations include establishing national beach SOPs, exposure-based reporting, consistent certification, and multilingual risk communication as prerequisites for integrating human security into tourism governance
Integrating Maqasid Syariah into Sustainable Halal Tourism in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review Fiya Ainur Rohmatika; Zainur Ridho; Moch Malik Dzulpikar; Joko Sutopo; Zidna Alaal Mujtaba; Andhika Nur Kurniawan
Jurnal Pariwisata Nusantara (JUWITA) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pariwisata Nusantara
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI PARIWISATA SYARAH, FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS ISLAM, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/juwita.v5i1.15369

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop an integrative conceptual framework linking Sharia objectives (maqasid al-sharia) with sustainable halal tourism in Southeast Asia through research landscape mapping, identification of key findings, and a comprehensive literature synthesis. Method: This study employs a mixed-methods approach integrating bibliometric analysis with a systematic literature review based on the PRISMA 2020 protocol. A total of 62 Scopus-indexed articles from 2019 to 2025 were analyzed using VOSviewer software to identify major thematic clusters. Result: The bibliometric analysis revealed five main thematic clusters: halal tourism and Islamic marketing; tourist satisfaction and loyalty; sustainable tourism; Muslim tourists and destination development; and religiosity and local wisdom. The findings indicate that maqasid al-sharia serves as an integrative axis capable of bridging fragmentation among these clusters. The dynamics of implementing sustainable halal tourism in Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Indonesia reveal diverse approaches grounded in maqasid al-sharia principles. Contribution: This study demonstrates that maqasid al-sharia can serve as a normative foundation for developing halal tourism that is ecologically, socially, and economically sustainable. The resulting integrative conceptual framework offers practical implications for policymakers, destination managers, and industry stakeholders in building a tourism ecosystem that is not only Sharia-compliant but also resilient, while contributing new theoretical knowledge by bridging the gap between Sharia principles and the global sustainability agenda.