YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Vol 8, No 2 (2017): Yudisia

Imbas Konsistensi Hukuman Mati pada Hubungan Bilateral dalam Kasus Narkoba

Rosyid, Moh (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
08 Apr 2018

Abstract

This article discusses about the debate over death penalty in the drug abuse cases. The Constitutional Court on October 30th, 2007 on the judicial review of Article 80 of the Law No 22/1997 on Drug declared that death penalty is not violating the Constitution which guarantees the right to life. Furthermore, Indonesia has ratified the International convention on narcotics and psychotropic. On the other hand, the opponent of death penalty argues that death penalty violates Article 28A of the Amendment of the Constitution that all people have the right to life. Secondly, death penalty is cruel and inhumane. Thirdly, there is possibility for false trial, and fourth, death penalty is not in-line with the reformation of penal law which imposes on restorative justice instead of retributive. Fifth, the effect is just a myth and sixth, the family becomes co-victim. Seventh, death penalty also threatened Indonesian living abroad and the last, death penalty cause the loss of Indonesia in International relations.

Copyrights © 2017






Journal Info

Abbrev

Yudisia

Publisher

Subject

Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Description

Artikel yang diterima dan diterbitkan dalam Jurnal YUDISIA harus masuk dalam lingkup keilmuan bidang hukum dan hukum Islam. Bidang hukum mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : hukum materiil dan formil, tinjauan hukum dari aspek politik, sosial, ekonomi, antropologi, psikologi. Bidang hukum ...