Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan
Vol 26, No 2 (2021): Edisi Mei

KAJIAN TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI PRODUK TABUNGAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT

Neysa Tania (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Jason Novienco (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara)
Dixon Sanjaya (Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara)



Article Info

Publish Date
22 May 2021

Abstract

Akses perumahan yang layak merupakan kebutuhan mendasar manusia yang dilindungi oleh Pasal 28H ayat (1) UUD Tahun 1945. Permasalahannya adalah tidak setiap orang memiliki akses terhadap pembiayaan untuk memperoleh rumah. Ketimpangan kondisi tersebut utamanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor pendapatan yang tidak merata. Pemerintah telah mengeluarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Tabungan Perumahan yang ditindaklanjuti dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Penyelenggaraan Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat walaupun peraturan tersebut menimbulkan sejumlah permasalahan selama masa pandemi Covid-19 yakni besaran iuran yang memberatkan pekerja dan pengusaha serta konflik norma dan ketidaksesuaian dengan pedoman pembentukan undang-undang. Penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan sinkronisasi hukum vertikal dan horizontal ini memperoleh hasil bahwa PP Tapera yang ditetapkan di masa pandemi Covid-19 mengandung cacat formil dan materiil dalam pembentukannya khususnya terhadap asas-asas dan norma yang diatur dalam PP Tapera tersebut. Program tabungan perumahan rakyat di masa pandemi Covid-19 yang memberatkan masyarakat juga inkonsisten terhadap penerapan hukum progresif yang seharusnya mengarahkan aturan hukum untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat dan bukan sebaliknya. Penelitian ini menyarakankan agar Pemerintah perlu merevisi kebijakan serta mensosialisasikan keberadaan tabungan perumahan rakyat kepada masyarakat agar tercipta kesepahaman antara para pihak.Access to adequate housing is a basic human need that is protected by Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The problem is that not everyone has access to finance to bought a house. Inequality conditions are mainly influenced by the factor of unequal income. The government has issued Act No. 4 of 2016 and the Government Regulation No. 25 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Public Housing Savings although this regulation caused problems during the Covid-19 Pandemic, namely the amount of contributions that burdened workers and employers as well as conflicting norms and non-compliance with the guidelines for the formation of the law. This normative juridical research with a vertical and horizontal legal synchronization approach obtained the results that the PP Tapera which was stipulated during the Covid-19 pandemic contained formal and material defects in its formation, especially regarding the principles and norms regulated in the PP Tapera. The public housing savings program during the Covid-19 pandemic which burdened the community was also inconsistent with the application of progressive law which should direct the rule of law to meet the needs of the community and not the other way around. This research suggests that the government needs to revise its policies and socialize the existence of public housing savings to the public in order to create an understanding between the parties.

Copyrights © 2021






Journal Info

Abbrev

perspektif

Publisher

Subject

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

PERSPEKTIF is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific articles in the field of law. The published articles are the results of original scientific research and review of legal interactions. PERSPEKTIF is published by the Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of University of ...