Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Neysa Tania

Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara

Author-ID : 3118523

Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1

KAJIAN TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI PRODUK TABUNGAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT Neysa Tania; Jason Novienco; Dixon Sanjaya
Perspektif Vol 26, No 2 (2021): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v26i2.800

Akses perumahan yang layak merupakan kebutuhan mendasar manusia yang dilindungi oleh Pasal 28H ayat (1) UUD Tahun 1945. Permasalahannya adalah tidak setiap orang memiliki akses terhadap pembiayaan untuk memperoleh rumah. Ketimpangan kondisi tersebut utamanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor pendapatan yang tidak merata. Pemerintah telah mengeluarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Tabungan Perumahan yang ditindaklanjuti dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Penyelenggaraan Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat walaupun peraturan tersebut menimbulkan sejumlah permasalahan selama masa pandemi Covid-19 yakni besaran iuran yang memberatkan pekerja dan pengusaha serta konflik norma dan ketidaksesuaian dengan pedoman pembentukan undang-undang. Penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan sinkronisasi hukum vertikal dan horizontal ini memperoleh hasil bahwa PP Tapera yang ditetapkan di masa pandemi Covid-19 mengandung cacat formil dan materiil dalam pembentukannya khususnya terhadap asas-asas dan norma yang diatur dalam PP Tapera tersebut. Program tabungan perumahan rakyat di masa pandemi Covid-19 yang memberatkan masyarakat juga inkonsisten terhadap penerapan hukum progresif yang seharusnya mengarahkan aturan hukum untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat dan bukan sebaliknya. Penelitian ini menyarakankan agar Pemerintah perlu merevisi kebijakan serta mensosialisasikan keberadaan tabungan perumahan rakyat kepada masyarakat agar tercipta kesepahaman antara para pihak.Access to adequate housing is a basic human need that is protected by Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The problem is that not everyone has access to finance to bought a house. Inequality conditions are mainly influenced by the factor of unequal income. The government has issued Act No. 4 of 2016 and the Government Regulation No. 25 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Public Housing Savings although this regulation caused problems during the Covid-19 Pandemic, namely the amount of contributions that burdened workers and employers as well as conflicting norms and non-compliance with the guidelines for the formation of the law. This normative juridical research with a vertical and horizontal legal synchronization approach obtained the results that the PP Tapera which was stipulated during the Covid-19 pandemic contained formal and material defects in its formation, especially regarding the principles and norms regulated in the PP Tapera. The public housing savings program during the Covid-19 pandemic which burdened the community was also inconsistent with the application of progressive law which should direct the rule of law to meet the needs of the community and not the other way around. This research suggests that the government needs to revise its policies and socialize the existence of public housing savings to the public in order to create an understanding between the parties.

PROBLEMATIKA EKSEKUSI HARTA PAILIT DI LUAR YURISDIKSI INDONESIA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN LINTAS NEGARA Neysa Tania; Gunardi Lie; Moody R Syailendra
PROSIDING SERINA Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): PROSIDING SERINA III 2021
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Tarumanagara

The world economy has integrated into the free trade era. Under this, the boundaries of conducting business transactions in these countries are no longer an obstacle. The existence of transnational elements also brings risks in the economic field; such as when a debtor becomes insolvent and bankrupt. The fulfillment of international elements in a cross-border bankruptcy case will certainly link the legal system of a country with other countries concerned. Moreover, it concerns the authority to execute bankruptcy assets outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia. Bearing in mind that each country has its own bankruptcy law regulations, each country is obliged to respect the laws of other countries following the principle of the jurisdiction of the country itself. Due to the sovereignty principle, the resolution of cross-border insolvency cases often becomes inefficient and effective. Moreover, because Indonesia still adheres to the territorial principle, the debtor can be bankrupted even though there are assets abroad, which makes it difficult for the curator to settle the debtor's assets. In addition, Indonesia is also not bound by international agreements regarding cross-border insolvency so that the inefficient regulation and settlement of cross-border insolvency cases can hamper the flow of receivables payments to all or part of certain creditors so that the smoothness, stability, and conduciveness of cross-border business activities can be disrupted. This research is a normative juridical research with library research as its method to further examine the problems of execution of bankrupt assets outside the jurisdiction of the territory of Indonesia.

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 2 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 2 Documents
Search