Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pengawasan Hakim Oleh Komisi Yudisial Dalam Prespektif Undang Undangdasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006)

Muhammad Alfariji Nasution (Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara)

Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat
Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Edisi Januari 2022

The authority of the Constitutional Court In the laws and regulations in Indonesia, it is authorized to adjudicate at the first and final level to: examine laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, decide on disputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, decide  dissolution of political parties, decide disputes about the results of general elections.The Legal Implication of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 005/PUU-IV/2006 is the weakening of the Judicial Commission through the Constitutional Court's Decision which results in the revocation of the authority of the Judicial Commission to carry out external supervision of the Constitutional Court and results in the loss of binding power for the supervision rules of the Judicial Commission and  the loss of most of the authority of the Judicial Commission to impose sanctions.The formulation of Supervision of Constitutional Justices and Judges Angung after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 005/PUU-IV/2006 is to establish an Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, hereinafter referred to as the Honorary Council, is a device established by the Constitutional Court to safeguard  and upholding the honor, dignity, and Code of Ethics of Constitutional Justices in relation to reports of alleged serious violations committed by the Reported Judge or the Suspected Judge submitted by the ethics council.Keywords: Judge Supervision