Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat
Muhammad Alfariji Nasution
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pengawasan Hakim Oleh Komisi Yudisial Dalam Prespektif Undang Undangdasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006) Muhammad Alfariji Nasution
Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Edisi Januari 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jhk.v21i2.4792

Abstract

The authority of the Constitutional Court In the laws and regulations in Indonesia, it is authorized to adjudicate at the first and final level to: examine laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, decide on disputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, decide  dissolution of political parties, decide disputes about the results of general elections.The Legal Implication of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 005/PUU-IV/2006 is the weakening of the Judicial Commission through the Constitutional Court's Decision which results in the revocation of the authority of the Judicial Commission to carry out external supervision of the Constitutional Court and results in the loss of binding power for the supervision rules of the Judicial Commission and  the loss of most of the authority of the Judicial Commission to impose sanctions.The formulation of Supervision of Constitutional Justices and Judges Angung after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 005/PUU-IV/2006 is to establish an Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, hereinafter referred to as the Honorary Council, is a device established by the Constitutional Court to safeguard  and upholding the honor, dignity, and Code of Ethics of Constitutional Justices in relation to reports of alleged serious violations committed by the Reported Judge or the Suspected Judge submitted by the ethics council.Keywords: Judge Supervision
Co-Authors