<![CDATA[Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif untuk menjelaskan pelaksanaan dan kualitas instrumen penilaian sumatif oleh satuan pendidikan yang berfokus pada penilaian aspek kognitif. Sampel dipilih melalui teknik random sampling. Data penelitian adalah data pelaksanaan dan instrumen penilaian hasil belajar sumatif mata pelajaran Seni Budaya aspek Seni Rupa di SMP Kabupaten Sleman berupa tes objektif dari kegiatan Penilaian Tengah Semester (PTS), Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) dan Penilaian Akhir Tahun (PAT) pada tahun 2019-2020. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis statistika deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan penilaian sumatif dilaksanakan oleh para guru Seni Budaya sesuai dengan acuan-acuan pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 yang disesuaikan dengan kebijakan sekolah. Instrumen utama penilaian sumatif tersebut berupa soal pilihan ganda dengan empat pilihan jawaban. Secara umum kualitas soal tersebut sangat baik dari segi materi, konstruksi, dan bahasa. Dari segi tingkat kesukaran, secara umum instrumen penilaian tersebut masih didominasi soal dengan tingkat kesukaran mudah dan sedang dan dari segi tingkat pengetahuan masih didominasi soal dalam kategori tingkat ingatan dan pemahaman dan belum mencakup soal untuk kategori high order thinking skill. Kata Kunci: kualitas instrumen, penilaian sumatif, seni rupa, SMP kabupaten Sleman THE QUALITY OF INSTRUMENTS OF ART LEARNING SUMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN SLEMAN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Abstract This research is a quantitative descriptive study to explain the implementation and quality of summative assessment instruments by educational units that focus on assessing cognitive aspects. The sample was selected by random sampling technique. The research data is the implementation and the assessment instruments for summative learning outcomes in the arts and cultural subject focusing on art aspect in junior high schools of Sleman Regency in the form of objective tests of Mid-Semester Assessment (PTS), Final Semester Assessment (PAS) and Year-End Assessment (PAT) in 2019 -2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The results showed that Cultural Arts teachers carried out the implementation of summative assessment in accordance with the guidelines for implementing the 2013 Curriculum, which was adjusted to school. The main instrument for summative assessment is multiple-choice questions with four answer choices. In general, the quality of the questions was very good in terms of material, construction, and language. In terms of the level of difficulty, in general, the assessment instrument is still dominated by questions with easy and moderate difficulty levels, and very little covers difficult questions. In terms of the level of knowledge, it is still dominated by questions in the category of memory and understanding levels. It does not include questions for the high-order thinking skill category. Keywords: instrument quality, summative assessment, art learning.]]>
Copyrights © 2021
