Pengembangan instrumen penilaian tematik berbasis HOTS untuk peserta didik kelas IV sekolah dasar

Ni Wayan Suarti (SDN 2 Sibetan)

Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED)
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): February 2022

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen penilaian tematik berbasis HOTS yang berkualitas secara teoretis dan empiris untuk peserta didik kelas IV SD. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah research and development, dengan langkah sebagai berikut: (1) potensi masalah, (2) perencanaan, (3) desain produk, (4) validasi produk oleh ahli, (5) revisi produk , (6) uji coba produk, (7) produk akhir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa instrumen penilaian tematik yang dikembangkan memiliki kualitas secara teoretis dan empiris. Kualitas secara teoretis berdasarkan penilaian dari 3 ahli yang menyimpulkan semua soal layak digunakan, karena terpenuhinya kriteria penulisan butir soal dari aspek materi, konstruksi, dan bahasa. Dari kriteria HOTS, 40 soal memenuhi kriteria soal HOTS, yaitu terpenuhinya aspek materi. Kualitas secara empiris berdasarkan analisis hasil uji coba lapangan. Semua butir soal memenuhi syarat validitas dan reliabilitas, dengan tingkat kesukarannya 32,5% soal mudah, sedang 57,5%, dan sukar 10%. Dari segi keefektifan distraktor ada 97,5% pengecoh berfungsi dan 2,5% pengecoh tidak berfungsi. This study aims to develop a HOTS-based thematic assessment instrument with theoretical and empirical quality for fourth grade elementary school students. The type of research used is research and development, with the following steps: (1) potential problems, (2) planning, (3) product design, (4) product validation by experts, (5) product revision, (6) testing product, (7) final product. The results showed that the thematic assessment instruments developed had theoretical and empirical qualities. The theoretical quality is based on the assessment of 3 experts who conclude that all the questions are suitable for use, because the criteria for writing the items from the material, construction, and language aspects are fulfilled. From the HOTS criteria, 40 questions meet the HOTS criteria, namely the fulfillment of the material aspects. Quality is empirically based on the analysis of the results of field trials. All items met the validity and reliability requirements, with a difficulty level of 32.5% for easy questions, 57.5% for medium, and 10% for difficult questions. In terms of distractor effectiveness, 97.5% of distractors are functioning and 2.5% of distractors are not functioning.