<![CDATA[Study on the juridical analysis of SEMA No. 3 of 2015 on the Decision of the Narcotics Law Number 35/2009 based on a hierarchical law with legal certainty is very necessary. The number of narcotics cases was decided as a crime of drug abuse, example of the decision of the narcotics case in the Lahat District Court, where the Panel of Judges sentenced based on Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law 3/2009 and the demands of the Public Prosecutor. His sentence was only ten months. far above the minimum sentence stated in Article 112 paragraph (1), which is four years according to SEMA 3/2015, where the judge may decide narcotics cases below the minimum. This violates the principle of "lex superior derogate legi inferiori", If there is a conflict between high and low laws and regulations, then the high one must take precedence. This type of research is normative, with analytical descriptive method. Research shows that SEMA is classified as a policy regulation (bleidsregel), and because it is intended specifically for court officials. The legal position of SEMA No.3/2015 on the Decision of Law No.35/2009 based on the hierarchical legislation in deciding narcotics cases deviates from the criminal rules stipulated in Law No.35/2009, and deviates from existing legal principles.]]>
Copyrights © 2022
