<![CDATA[The considerations of the Panel of Judges in the first instance of the courts (High Religious Court of Bengkulu) are: 1) Frequent quarrels and quarrels between husband and wife are not solely due to the mistakes of the wife, but also because there is no mutual understanding between the two parties. 2) The evidence submitted in the form of photographs and statements of witnesses is not sufficient to prove the behavior of nusyuz of the wife because it is not equipped with other supporting evidence.3) Criminal acts of corruption committed by the wife can not be used as the basis of the assessment that the concerned has acted and behave nusyuz, not directly related to the rights and duties between husband and wife in household affairs. 4) The wife likes to indebted to a third party without the knowledge of her husband can not necessarily be the legal basis that the concerned has acted nushyuz. Because there is only one evidence that explicitly indicates that the concerned has paid off the wife’s debts, while other evidence shows the wife who has paid off its own debts. 5) The occurrence of separation of residence between husband and wife is not because the wife has left the place of residence without the applicant’s / appealed permission, but the separation of the applicant’s / appellate residence has surrendered his wife to his parents in a kinship and good manner. 6) During the sepa- ration of the house because of repatriation to the home of her parents, the wife remains obedient to the wishes of the applicant/ comparable is to remain settled in the home of his parents. 7) The wife as the plaintiff of reconvention is not proven to act and behave nusyuz as the opinion of the court of first instance. So that he remains legally entitled to get the rights as a devout wife to the husband. 8) During the separation of the husband’s dwelling only performs the obligation as a father to his childre.that is transfer to the savings account of his children. Second, in terms of the jurisprudence]]>
Copyrights © 2018
