TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PRAPERADILAN JAMINAN PERLINDUNGAN HAM SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 21/PPU-XII/2014 DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERADILAN PIDANA

Salundik . (STIH Tambun Bungai Palangkaraya)

Belom Bahadat : Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu
Vol 12 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Belom Bahadat Hukum Agama Hindu

The principal thing which is progress in the provisions of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code which has been in effect since December 31, 1981 until now, namely the existence of a pretrial institution is regulated in chapter X articles 77 to article 83, but in this provision there is no mention of authority. The pretrial judge determines whether the determination of a suspect is legal by the investigator, although the minimum parameter of 2 (two) pieces of evidence is the keyword in determining the suspect, but at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence are not independent parameters. Because the acquisition is also influenced by other factors on which it is based. Therefore, the acquisition of these factors also affects the validity of the acquisition of at least 2 (two) pieces of evidence which will have a final impact on the validity of the determination of the suspect by the investigator. In connection with the task of trying judges as the main actors of judicial power in Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, that judges have obligations including: obliged to explore, follow and understand legal values ​​and a sense of justice that lives in Public. So the judge in pretrial cases has the authority to examine (assess) the performance of the results of the investigation from the investigator, that is, everything that underlies and occurs in the investigation will also have an influence on the determination of the suspect, as the main orientation of the investigation. Therefore, everything that underlies and occurs in the investigation process that has an impact on the determination of the suspect is taken into account in determining the validity of the determination of the suspect based on the nature of pretrial, namely as a form of supervision and objection mechanism to the law enforcement process which is closely related to the guarantee of the protection of human rights in From the perspective of criminal justice, the renewal of the Criminal Procedure Code must explicitly include the authority of pretrial judges in determining whether the status of a suspect is legal by investigators.