<![CDATA[ABSTRAK: Tujuan dilakukannya penilitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap dalam menilai keterangan ahli dalam pemeriksaan perkara usaha penambangan illegal (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negri Cilacap Nomor : 447/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn Clp).Penelitian inimerupakan penelitian hokum doktrin alat aunormatif, bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hokum sekunder, pengumpulan bahan hokum dengan cara studi pustaka, menggunakan pendekata nkasus dan teknikanalisis bahan hokum menggunakan metodesilogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat diambil simpulan bahwa, Keterangan ahli harus dipertimbangkan hakim dalammemutusperkarausaha penambangan illegal. Namun untuk menilai kebenarannya perlu dilihat juga persesuaian tersebut dengan alat bukti lain.Kata Kunci : Pertimbangan Hakim, Keterangan Ahli, Perkara Penambangan IlegalABSTRACT: The purpose of this research is to find out the consideration of the Cilacap District Court judges in assessing expert statements in the examination of illegal mining business cases (Case Study of the Cilacap State Court Number: 447 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / Pn Clp). This research is a doctrinal or normative legal research, prescriptive and applied in nature. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, collection of legal materials by means of literature study, using a case approach and legal material analysis techniques using the syllogism method and interpretation using deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that, the statement of the expert must be considered by the judge in deciding the caseillegal mining business. However, in order to assess the truth, it is also necessary to look at the compatibility with other evidence.Key Words: Judge Consideration, Expert Statement, Illegal Mining Cases ]]>
Copyrights © 2022
