<![CDATA[This article examines and describes the problems regarding asset confiscation regulations from the Law on the eradication and prevention of money laundering (UU TPPU), the Law on eradicating corruption (UU Tipikor) and Peraturan Jaksa Nomor 7 of 2020 tentang Pedoman Pemulihan Aset. The method used is normative research. This research is an applied prescriptive research with a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. Types and sources of legal materials used are secondary data including primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques using document studies or literature studies. The analysis technique is to use content analysis. The results of the research show that the confiscation of assets as a crime of money laundering resulting from corruption by the prosecutor's office based on the regulations of the UU TPPU and UU Tipikor has not run optimally if it does not use the legal instrument Perja Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Pemulihan Aset, and it will be even better with the passing of the Asset Confiscation Bill Criminal act (RUU Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana)]]>
Copyrights © 2023
