The Analogical Reasoning Thinking Process Viewed from Self-Efficacy

Fitrianto Eko Subekti (Doctoral Students of Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia)
Y. L. Sukestiyarno (Mathematics Department Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia)
Wardono Wardono (Mathematics Department Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia)
Isnaini Isnaini (Mathematics Department Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia)

Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology
Vol. 7 (2021)

This study aims to describe the analogical reasoning thinking process in terms of self-efficacy on set material. Student self-efficacy data were obtained through questionnaires, while analogical reasoning deemed process data received from tests and in-depth interviews. The sampling method was using the purposive sampling technique. Data analysis used the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and concluding. The study results show that: Respondents with moderate self-efficacy tended not to understand the concept of a combination of sets, which resulted in an inability to solve problems related to intersection and combination questions in the three sets. Respondents with high self-efficacy tend to determine the pattern of the relationship between a slice and a combination of two sets with a piece and a variety of three sets. And 3) respondents with moderate and high self-efficacy tend to solve set problems using Venn sets' help.