Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan


TELAAH KRITIS PUTUSAN ARBITRASE SEBAGAI DASAR PERMOHONAN PAILIT

Harahap, Syaiful Khoiri (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Sep 2022

Abstract

Against the arbitral award, the parties should be able to implement it voluntarily. If the losing party does not want to carry out its obligations by the specified deadline, then the obligation is a debt that must be paid by the debtor to the creditor. Based on article 8 paragraph 4, the proof in bankruptcy must be proven simply as a condition for bankruptcy of the debtor. The arbitration award should be the basis for the bankruptcy of the debtor. From the research results it can be concluded that bankruptcy can only occur if the debtor admits that he has debts to creditors and this must be proven simply. The commercial court considers the application of the arbitration award as the basis for filing a bankruptcy petition to be excessive and overlapping, resulting in the rejection of the bankruptcy petition. Therefore, judges are advised to enforce the provisions as stated in the law and be able to make legal breakthroughs (legal discoveries) in the field of bankruptcy.

Copyrights © 2022






Journal Info

Abbrev

publication:jhp

Publisher

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (JHP) is one of the oldest published law journals in Indonesia. Published in 1971 by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia originally titled "Hukum & Pembangunan". JHP adopts a double-blind peer review policy, and focused on various subdisciplines of the legal science, ...