<![CDATA[This article asserts that some general AIs are incomprehensible to humans and that computers are innately incapable of performing certain human cognitive activities, including 1) Misconceptions of Godel's theorem and related statistics and mathematical results are at the root of objections to using AI; 2) Reductionism and objections to monistic reductionism, as well as a minimal appreciation of responses to different levels of discussion; 3) Concerns raised by a thorough understanding of computers or computing Developing a model in which "cognitive" functions can be created independently and referred to as "wetware" is pragmatic, according to a psychologist. The cognitive and essential assumptions for individuals involved in the usefulness of AI are pragmatic. From this point of view, AI is heavily invested in the future of cognitive psychology, if only because of their similar fate.]]>
Copyrights © 2022
