<![CDATA[General elections as a means of democracy in Indonesia still face various challenges, including election violations and crimes. Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections regulates administrative violations, violations of the code of ethics, and election crimes. However, there is still ambiguity in the regulation and classification of election violations and crimes. The case study of the Palu High Court decision Number 71/Pid.Sus/2019/PT PAL shows an example of an election crime in the form of campaigning during the quiet period. The defendant, a candidate for DPRD member, was proven to have violated Article 523 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 280 paragraph (1) letter j of Law No. 7/2017 by distributing stickers and promising rice to voters during the quiet period. A similar decision was also found in a 2014 case at the Mamuju District Court. The aim of this research is to find out the legal basis for general election crimes, and also to find out the judge's considerations in decision number: 71/Pid.Sus/2019/PT PAL.These cases illustrate the challenges in enforcing election criminal law, especially regarding illegal campaigning during the quiet period. Clearer regulations and effective law enforcement are needed to ensure the integrity of the election process in Indonesia.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
