<![CDATA[is paper proposed the integral-proportional-derivative (I-PD) as an extension of the conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) method that has been used in many brushless direct current (BLDC) applications to control the BLDC motor that can deal with desired speed (reference) changes. It has elucidated a comprehensive comparative analysis between PID, intending to delineate the most efficacious control approach based on a thorough evaluation. This paper scrutinizes four principal methods: proportional-integral (PI), integral-proportional (I-P), PID, and I-PD. Our findings indicate that in the presence of voltage spike constraints, I-P or I-PD emerges as the optimum choice for both four-pole and six-pole motors. Where maximum difference (MaxDiff) is the principal consideration, PI, and I-P are identified as the most suitable methods. Conversely, when the primary objective is to minimize root mean square error (RMSE), PI proves superior for four-pole motors, while PID is preferable for six-pole types. Notably, I-P demonstrates excellent performance in terms of settling time for both motor types. In summation, I-P stands out as the preeminent choice if the objective is to select a singular method that ensures optimal performance across all parameters for a four-pole or six-pole motor.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
