<![CDATA[Despite a peace agreement being legally enforceable and officially recognized and accepted by both parties, the debtor may choose not to proceed with it. If the debtor fails to meet their obligations, the creditor has the right to demand that the peace agreement be terminated and declare the debtor insolvent. When petitioning for the termination of this peace agreement, the judge will naturally consider the provided information as well as the relevant bankruptcy and PKPU laws, notably Law Number 37 of 2004. This research utilizes a normative juridical approach, which includes analytical and descriptive aspects. The research aims to scrutinize and analyze the legal factors considered by the Commercial Court judges at the Semarang District Court during the invalidation of the peace agreement 23/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2018/Pn. Smg, as well as the ratification of peace agreement number 24/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/Pn. Smg, as indicated in Decision Number 20/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/Pn. Smg and Jo. Number 23/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2018/Pn. Smg. The research findings indicate that the Case Examining Panel of Judges invalidated the approved peace agreement due to evidence of the debtor's violation of contract or negligence. This led to the declaration of the debtor's insolvency and the termination of the corresponding peace agreement.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
