<![CDATA[It is stated in the constitution that the Constitutional Court is the court of first and last instance whose decision is final. Problems arise when the Constitutional Court's decision requires follow-up to make it happen and other institutions follow up on it. This research is normative research that examines compliance with the Constitutional Court's decision as a constitutional obligation to legislate and a moral obligation to legislate using a conceptual approach. The results of this research show that non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's decision is a form of disloyalty and defiance of the constitution itself or what is referred to as constitutional disobedience. In addition, with the consideration that the Constitutional Court is a negative legislature, there are no special enforcement agencies, and there are no juridical consequences for ignoring the Constitutional Court's decision. Thus, the application of Lawrence Kohlberg's 4 moral orientations must be put forward as fulfilling moral obligations. This research concluded that obedience to the Constitutional Court decisions is not only a constitutional obligation for legislators but also a moral obligation for legislators.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
