<![CDATA[The matter of connectivity is a criminal matter carried out by military personnel and civilians, both jointly (mede dader) and as accomplices (deelneming), so in the resolution process, it is regulated by several laws and regulations because it involves two jurisdictions, namely civilian and military courts. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate that in cases where the damage is more inclined towards military interests, the case is tried in military court, and if the damage is heavier on civilian/public (non-military) interests, there is a possibility of being tried in civilian court. A descriptive approach in qualitative research was used to systematically and quickly gather factual data in accordance with the description when conducting research. The results of this research show that although Article 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) explains which jurisdiction handles the case, it is in the hands of the research team, including the prosecutor or chief prosecutor and military prosecutor or chief military prosecutor, based on Article 33 of the Supreme Court Law, the Supreme Court is worthy of taking over this authority.]]>
Copyrights © 2020
