<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the implications of the Constitutional Court decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023, one of which contains the elimination of the 4% parliamentary threshold regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections as one of the legal bases for implementation. election in 2029. The Constitutional Court (MK) considers that the parliamentary threshold provisions are not in line with the principles of popular sovereignty, electoral fairness, and violate the legal certainty guaranteed by the constitution. This research is library research which examines the Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023. This research is descriptive analytical in nature, namely by describing the description of the object under study based on facts that appear as they are and then analyzing them to reveal the meanings behind these facts. The approach used in this research is a normative approach. In this research, it is explained that the existence of the Parliamentary Threshold is not effective enough as a mechanism to simplify the existence of political parties in the electoral system in Indonesia. It even tends to harm the constitutional rights of citizens who represent their constituents. The existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XXI/2023 provides a breath of fresh air to create justice in the implementation of the 2029 elections in Indonesia]]>
Copyrights © 2024
