The URGENSI KETERANGAN AHLI HUKUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PENGUJIAN FORMIL UNDANG-UNDANG

Febry Indra Gunawan Sitorus, S.H. (a:1:{s:5:"id_ID"s:99:"Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia"})

Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Vol 4 No 8 (2023): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan

This article aims to describe the position of legal expert's testimony in a formal constitutional review and what is the urgency. The result show that: first, the constitutional court recognizes the testimony of legal experts as one of the evidence as secondary evidence; second, in practice, there is no decision was found the constitutional judges elaborated the evidence of legal expert testimony in the verdict. Rrecommendation: First; to reconstruct the position of legal expert testimony in the formal constitutional review; Second; the Constitutional Court should firmly stipulate that the testimony of legal experts cannot be submitted as an evidence. Keywords: Formal Constitutional Review of Law, Evidence, Legal Expert Evidence