Febry Indra Gunawan Sitorus, S.H.
a:1:{s:5:"id_ID";s:99:"Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Militer dan Tata Usaha Negara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia";}

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The URGENSI KETERANGAN AHLI HUKUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM PENGUJIAN FORMIL UNDANG-UNDANG Febry Indra Gunawan Sitorus, S.H.
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 8 (2023): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to describe the position of legal expert's testimony in a formal constitutional review and what is the urgency. The result show that: first, the constitutional court recognizes the testimony of legal experts as one of the evidence as secondary evidence; second, in practice, there is no decision was found the constitutional judges elaborated the evidence of legal expert testimony in the verdict. Rrecommendation: First; to reconstruct the position of legal expert testimony in the formal constitutional review; Second; the Constitutional Court should firmly stipulate that the testimony of legal experts cannot be submitted as an evidence. Keywords: Formal Constitutional Review of Law, Evidence, Legal Expert Evidence