<![CDATA[Predicting vehicle fuel consumption is an important aspect in improving energy efficiency and supporting sustainable transportation. This study aims to compare the performance of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) algorithms in predicting combined vehicle fuel consumption (COMBINED, a combination of 55% urban and 45% highway). The Canadian government's Fuel Consumption Ratings dataset was used, with 2015-2023 data (9,185 entries) for training and testing, and 2024 data (764 entries) for further testing. Pre-processing involved StandardScaler for numerical features and OneHotEncoder for categorical features, followed by hyperparameter optimization using Grid Search, resulting in optimal parameters: SVR (C=100, epsilon=0.5, gamma=1) and RFR (n_estimators=200, max_depth=None, min_samples_split=2). Results show RFR is superior with R2 0.8845, RMSE 0.9671, and MAE 0.6566, compared to SVR with R2 0.8648, RMSE 1.0462, and MAE 0.7150. Evaluation on 2024 data and visualization of error distribution corroborate the superiority of RFR. This study concludes RFR is more effective for COMBINED prediction, although SVR is competitive post-optimization, and contributes to the selection of machine learning models for green vehicle technology.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
