<![CDATA[The application of machine learning (ML) in actuarial science and life insurance has driven digital transformation in mortality risk prediction. This article conducts research using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology with the PRISMA approach to evaluate the performance comparison between ML methods and traditional actuarial models in predicting mortality risk. This study analyzed publication trends, geographic and institutional distribution, and methodologies used in the literature published between 2019 and 2025. The results from SLR show that ML methods, especially Random Forest and XGBoost, have superior predictive accuracy compared to traditional actuarial models such as Traditional Logistic Regression and Cox Proportional Hazards. However, despite the obvious accuracy advantage, issues of interpretability and long-term stability remain a major challenge in implementing ML in the actuarial industry. This study also identifies the need for a hybrid approach combining the strengths of both methodologies to improve prediction accuracy while maintaining high interpretability. This study suggests the need for further development in the application of ML by the regulation and compliance of the insurance industry. The findings provide insights for actuarial practitioners, regulators, and academics regarding the potential and challenges of using ML in mortality risk prediction.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
