<![CDATA[Purpose: This study discusses the territorial boundary conflict between Malaka Regency and South Central Timor Regency. Methodology: This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. The dominant forms of analysis carried out in case study research are pattern matching, explanation building, and time-series analysis. Results: The boundary conflict between Malaka Regency and South Central Timor Regency in the Lotas Segment was driven by three main factors: communication, institutional structure, and personal interests. This conflict has resulted in delays in public service delivery, weakened community cohesion, and damaged relationships and communication among the parties involved. Conclusion: The study concludes that the boundary conflict is influenced by communication, institutional, and personal factors, requiring stronger coordination, effective communication, and mediation between stakeholders to achieve a sustainable resolution. Limitations: The limitation of this study is the lack ofhistorical investigation of boundary conflicts between the two conflicting areas. Contribution: This study provides recommendations for local governments to strengthen negotiation and mediation in resolving territorial boundary disputes.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
