Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang
Vol. 12 No. 02 (2026): Volume 12 No. 01 Maret 2026 Produce

STUDI PERBANDINGAN KONSTITUSI TENTANG PENGATURAN IMPEACHMENT PRESIDEN NEGARA INDONESIA DAN JERMAN

Riyadi Eko Prasetyo (Unknown)
Zainal Arifin Hoesein (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
28 Jan 2026

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state based on law, governs its affairs based on law or rechtstaat. Legal rules were created to prevent the growth of arbitrary power. This also applies to the presidential impeachment mechanism. The results show that the impeachment schemes between Indonesia and the Federal Republic of Germany share similarities. The Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate through the impeachment process. Although there are fundamental technical differences, the German Constitutional Court does not have a direct role in dismissing the Head of State but rather focuses on the constitutional review of laws. In Indonesia, the Constitutional Court is involved in the substantive verification of charges against the President and Vice President. From the perspective of the theory of the purpose of law, the Constitutional Court's position is as the guardian of the constitution and democracy, where impeachment of a head of state must be based purely on objectively proven errors, not politically motivated.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

didaktik

Publisher

Subject

Education

Description

Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang adalah salah satu jurnal yang dterbitkan oleh STKIP Subang, jurnal ini mempunyai bidang cakupan yaitu Penelitian Pendidikan. Terbit pada bulan Juni dan Desember setiap tahunnya. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang melalui proses review oleh dua ...