<![CDATA[Access to justice is a state guarantee to all its citizens, that every citizen must have access to justice. The facts on the ground, they are not easy to implement, due to the high costs of the case, the low public understanding of access to justice, low public awareness of accessing justice, as well as geographical conditions, especially with regard to distance travel and unsustainable transprotation. There are some religious courts that have very broad jurisdiction with geographical conditions, in which remote communities are not easy to reach the court office in question. One of the efforts made by the Supreme Court in the framework of justice for all, is a round trial. Whether the circuit court is capable of providing access to justice to remote communities, that's why this study is being conducted. Using the theory of legal effectiveness, the results of this study show that the execution of the mobile court the Religious Court of Tenggarong is effective and Religious Court of Sangata is not effective in giving access to justice because not all areas that are in the jurisdiction of religious courts fo Sangata are the place of execution. Besides, the public awareness is also low, as evidenced by the fact that sometimes the execution of circular hearings only few register.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
