Planning process of sustainable village tourism masterplan based on local wisdom in Sutojayan Village, Malang Regency

Isnandar Isnandar (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Joko Samodra (Animation, Faculty of Vocational Studies, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Muhammad Aris Ichwanto (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Wahyu Sakti Gunawan Irianto (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Salsabila Thifal Nabil Haq (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Rian Syahmulloh Hendranawan (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Luhur Adi Prasetya (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Amir Rofiudin (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Ary Agung Wibowo (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Irva Widiyawati (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)
Khusnul Muttaqiyah (Master of Vocational Education, Graduate School, State University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia)

Region : Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Perencanaan Partisipatif
Vol 21, No 1 (2026)

This study examines the planning process of a sustainable village tourism master plan based on local wisdom in Sutojayan Village, Pakisaji District, Malang Regency. A deductive rationalistic approach was applied, with data collected through field observations, in-depth interviews, questionnaires, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) involving local residents, village officials, and community leaders. The results indicate that Sutojayan Village possesses considerable tourism potential derived from its natural landscapes, traditional agricultural practices, and local cultural assets. Community participation in the planning process reached 80%, while government support in the form of training programs and basic facility provision accounted for approximately 70%, highlighting the need for improvements in budget allocation and infrastructure quality. Key recommendations include the development of thematic tourism, enhancement of infrastructure capacity, tourism management training, and environmental education for younger generations. A well-structured master plan grounded in local wisdom is expected to promote sustainable tourism development and improve community welfare.