<![CDATA[Understanding á¹£aḥīḥ ḥadÄ«ths has remained a critical methodological discourse in both classical and contemporary Islamic studies. Two major hermeneutical approaches—textual and contextual—are central to this discourse. The textual approach emphasizes a literalist reading of the ḥadÄ«th text in order to preserve the authenticity and sanctity of the Prophet Muhammad’s teachings. In contrast, the contextual approach considers the socio-historical and cultural background in which a ḥadÄ«th was transmitted, thereby enabling its normative messages to remain relevant to contemporary realities. This article addresses the methodological question of how these two interpretative approaches can be integrated to respond to the dynamic challenges of modern Muslim life.This study employs a qualitative-descriptive method using a library research model. The primary sources include both classical ḥadÄ«th compilations and contemporary scholarly literature. Selected á¹£aḥīḥ ḥadÄ«ths that are often debated between textualist and contextualist interpretations are analyzed to demonstrate the theoretical implications of both approaches. Findings indicate that the textual and contextual approaches are not inherently contradictory but rather complementary. The textual method safeguards the transmissional integrity (riwÄyah) of the ḥadÄ«th, while the contextual approach ensures that its meanings (dirÄyah) can be appropriately situated within evolving socio-cultural frameworks. The integration of both provides a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of Prophetic traditions. In conclusion, a synthesis between textual fidelity and contextual relevance is essential to interpret ḥadÄ«ths holistically. This integrative framework is proposed as a viable model for contemporary ḥadÄ«th interpretation that is both normatively authentic and socially responsive.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
