Language not only functions as a means of conveying information, but also as a means of carrying out actions through speech, especially in a political context where language can shape public opinion and legitimize power. This study aims to analyze the types and functions of illocutionary acts in Donald Trump's speech announcing the Gaza ceasefire. The method used is descriptive qualitative with documentation techniques, where data in the form of speech utterances are transcribed, selected, and classified based on Austin's (1962) and Searle's (1969) speech act theories. The research results show that assertive speech acts were the most dominant type (6 data), used to describe situations, express evaluations, and build peace narratives. In addition, expressive speech acts (5 data) were found expressing gratitude and appreciation, commissive speech acts (2 data) indicating a commitment to future cooperation, and directive speech acts (2 data) which were light and rhetorical in nature. No declarative speech acts were found in this speech. In conclusion, Trump's speech did not aim to create direct legal or institutional action, but rather to frame his role as a peacemaker and diplomatic success through linguistic construction. These findings underscore the importance of pragmatic analysis in understanding political communication strategies and how language is used to shape public perceptions in the context of international relations.
Copyrights © 2026