Kedudukan Gratifikasi Seksual dalam KUHP Nasional: Studi Komparatif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Singapura

Sabrina Gita Salsabella (Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang)
Nadea Lathifah Nugraheni (Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang)
Praditya Arcy Pratama (Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang)

Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Tema Hukum Internasional

Sexual gratification enforcement in Indonesia faces legal ambiguity. This study examines its position in Indonesian criminal law through a comparative study with Singapore. Using normative methods and a socio-legal approach, findings show that Indonesia's "other facilities" phrase in Article 12B of the AntiCorruption Law causes legal uncertainty and evidentiary difficulties. Conversely, Singapore’s Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) applies a broad interpretation of "undue advantage," covering all subjective benefits, including sexual services, supported by established jurisprudence. This research recommends a transformation toward substantial justice in Indonesia.