<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the mechanism for reviewing Regional Regulations (Perda) through two forms: executive review and judicial review, as a means of implementing the principle of the rule of law in Indonesia. As a nation governed by the rule of law, every Perda must have a clear legal basis, not conflict with regulations at a higher level, and be able to meet the interests of the wider community. The method used in this research is normative juridical with a library approach, focusing on the analysis of applicable regulations and related court decisions. The research findings indicate that the Central Government's Executive Review of Regional Regulations (Perda) is a form of preventive and repressive Review aimed at maintaining the legal and regulatory hierarchy. However, following Constitutional Court Decision No. 137/PUU-XIII/2015, the Ministry of Home Affairs' authority to annul Perda has been limited, strengthening the role of Judicial Review by the Supreme Court. Judicial Review plays a crucial role in realizing justice, providing legal certainty, and protecting human rights from potential abuse of authority at the regional level. This study concludes that synergy between executive Review, in the form of guidance and supervision, and judicial Review as a dispute resolution mechanism is crucial for producing regional legal products that are responsive, democratic, and support the rule of law]]>
Copyrights © 2026
