<![CDATA[This research examines the evidentiary value of unsworn testimony provided by child victims and analyzes judicial considerations in imposing sanctions for child molestation cases through the perspective of the negative statutory proof theory. Employing a normative legal research method, the study applies statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, with a focus on Cilacap District Court Decision Number 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Clp. The findings reveal that a child victim’s statement delivered without an oath does not qualify as independent legal evidence under Article 185 paragraph (7) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Nevertheless, such testimony may contribute to the evidentiary process when supported by other lawful evidence, including witness statements, the defendant’s confession, and the Visum et Repertum. The court’s reasoning demonstrates the application of the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle through the Child Protection Act, which served as the legal basis for establishing the defendant’s guilt. Accordingly, this study highlights the need for standardized child-sensitive examination procedures to ensure effective legal protection and minimize the risk of revictimization during judicial proceedings.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
