<![CDATA[This research is motivated by the emergence of a dispute over the State Administrative Decision concerning parole in Case Number 357/G/2025/PTUN.JKT, which has sparked debate regarding the legality of administrative government decisions and the role of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in conducting judicial oversight. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of state administrative law regarding parole decisions under Indonesian positive law and to examine the role of the PTUN in testing the validity and overseeing controversial administrative government decisions. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that law enforcement of parole decisions is carried out through examination of aspects of authority, procedure, substance, and the General Principles of Good Governance. The PTUN serves as an instrument of judicial oversight authorized to assess the legality of administrative decisions, prevent abuse of authority, and ensure legal certainty, accountability, and the realization of good governance principles in government administration.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
