<![CDATA[The connection case is a mechanism for resolving criminal acts involving perpetrators from the general andmilitary courts, thus requiring coordination between law enforcement officials. The establishment of the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes (JAMPIDMIL) through Law Number 11 of 2021 strengthens this coordination, including in handling corruption cases related to the procurement of satellites by the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions for connection cases based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice, as well as to analyze the application of connection procedural law by JAMPIDMIL in the corruption case of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia satellite. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach, which are analyzed qualitatively. The results show that Law Number 20 of 2025 functions as a lex generalis that regulates coordination in the integrated criminal justice system, while Law Number 31 of 1997 is a lex specialis that regulates the mechanisms for connection cases. The application of connectivity procedural law in satellite corruption cases has been implemented through coordination between JAMPIDMIL, the Prosecutor's Office, the Military Audit Office, and the Military Police, resulting in more effective, integrated case handling and legal certainty. Although harmonization of regulations regarding JAMPIDMIL's authority is still needed.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
