This study was motivated by a candidacy dispute in the 2024 Belu Regional Head Election concerning the eligibility of a former convict running for the position of Deputy Regent, which raised public concern regarding the accountability of the General Election Commission of Belu Regency in verifying candidate requirements. The study aimed to analyze the accountability of the General Election Commission of Belu Regency in the verification of candidate eligibility requirements for the 2024 Regional Head Election. A qualitative method with a case study approach was employed. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The analysis was based on Mark Bovens' Public Accountability Theory, which includes legal, procedural, and political accountability. The findings indicate that the General Election Commission of Belu Regency conducted candidate verification in accordance with applicable legal provisions, implemented administrative verification procedures, and maintained accountability through available dispute resolution mechanisms. However, greater transparency and more effective public communication remain necessary to strengthen public trust in electoral administration. The study concludes that the accountability of the General Election Commission of Belu Regency has been adequately implemented across legal, procedural, and political dimensions and recommends improving information transparency, inter-agency coordination, and public communication to promote more accountable, transparent, and democratic electoral governance.
Copyrights © 2026