<![CDATA[The Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill (RUU PA) represents a paradigm shift in Indonesia’s approach to combatting economic crime by enabling non-conviction-based asset seizure through in rem proceedings. Traditional conviction-based mechanisms under the Indonesian Penal Code and Anti-Money Laundering Law have failed to recover more than 7.8% of state losses from corruption, undermining public trust and fiscal capacity. By comparing the U.S. civil forfeiture framework, the U.K. Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, and Singapore’s CDSA regime, this study identifies the legal standards, procedural safeguards, and institutional designs that maximize asset recovery while protecting fundamental rights. Key findings highlight the necessity of clear evidentiary thresholds, third-party protections, and judicial oversight to prevent abuse of power. Recommendations include harmonizing RUU PA with existing criminal procedure codes, establishing an independent asset management agency, and incorporating meaningful public participation. These reforms aim to strengthen Indonesia’s legal infrastructure, enhance state revenue recovery, and deter high-level corruption.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
