<![CDATA[This study investigates the complex relationship between communication restrictions and democratic health in Indonesia, focusing on the systemic use of censorship as a response to political mobilization. As Indonesia navigates a period of "democratic backsliding," the state has increasingly relied on both legal and technical instruments to manage political discourse and suppress dissent. Utilizing a qualitative framework based on legal policy analysis and case studies of mass mobilization (such as the 2019 post-election riots and the 2025 "Reformasi Dikorupsi" protests), this paper examines three primary modes of restriction: the application of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, the implementation of targeted internet shutdowns, and the strategic moderation of social media content. The findings reveal that while the government justifies these measures as necessary for maintaining "public order" and curbing "hoaxes," they often function as tools of digital repression that create a "spiral of silence" among activists and journalists. The research further highlights the role of "Ministerial Regulation 5 (MR5)" in forcing platform compliance, effectively outsourcing censorship to private technology companies. The study argues that these restrictions do not merely silence individual voices but structurally undermine the "digital public sphere" by disrupting the flow of real-time information during critical political events. The paper concludes that the normalization of communication restrictions in Indonesia signals a shift toward a more illiberal democratic model, where the infrastructure of the internet is weaponized to preserve political stability at the expense of civil liberties. These insights provide a critical assessment of the tension between state security and freedom of expression in the world's third-largest democracy.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
